| Minority
Rights:
Myth or Genuine Moral Commitment to Equality?
By: Tony Jones
The extent to which
Minority Rights are constantly denied, necessitates an immediate moral commitment to
equality, and not the reluctant approach at implementing measures to eliminate
exploitation of man by man. In recent years there has been a proliferation of
disadvantaged minorities throughout the world, which maybe the most marked feature of our
time.
The concept of minority rights conjures up the image of majority power.
It is an apparent abuse of this power relation by the majority that brings into focus the
protection of minority rights.From all indications the severity of this problem is
undeniable, it had been manifested in Britain and the United States of America, as both
countries went through two distinct periods;
- One in which Anti-discrimination laws were the focus of political activity regarding
race relation;
- One in which an emphasis on social rights (social equality), not just on civil and
political rights, began to emerge and cause conflict.
In Britain, the symbolic catalyst for the anti-discrimination
legislation of 1968 was the publication of the Political and Economic Planning (PEP), a
report on Racial Discrimination against colored immigrants and their children.
The civil rights legislation in America was precipitated by the August
1963 Great March, when some 200,000 demonstrators listened to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.,
as he delivered his now famous I had a Dream speech at Lincoln Memorial in Washington.
Discrimination against minorities implies that they
suffer from social inequalities as a group and this is plagues by an unequal distribution
of political resources. Fighting discrimination is seeking to overcome an inadequacy or
lack of political and economic power.
If the social system includes prejudice, (Institutionalized racism) and
encourages discrimination, how will forces with a propensity for self-preservation defend
minority rights? How much longer will the power elite (WASPs) continue to exploit,
dominate and subjugate other races? It seems reasonable to deduce that relinquishing or
sharing that power will not be voluntary or attained by peaceful abdication.
The issue of minority rights stem from, but is in no way limited to
among other things . . .
- The forced migration of Africans to the New World during the Atlantic Slave Trade. It
was during a servile status, endured through three centuries that mainly impeded the
assimilation. More than a century after emancipation, many African descendants have become
disadvantaged minorities in countries of North, Central and South America;
- Minority groups
- created by colonial rule, as a result of the need for certain kinds of labor or
technical skills not locally available. There were Indian plantation workers who migrated
during the mid-nineteenth century to almost every colony where sugar had previously been
cultivated by Black slaves-Fiji, Mauritius, Natal and the Caribbean region. The appearance
of these Indian workers made British rule possible in Malaya and Burma, in East and
Central Africa, and parts of the pacific;
- Chinese migrant workers settled in Dutch, French, British and American colonies in South
East Asia. There were the Lebanese in West Africa, the Greeks and Cypriots in the Belgian
Congo. In each instance these minorities were secured while colonial rule lasted. They
enjoyed a level of economic and social privilege beyond that which the indigenous
inhabitants attained. With decolonization the migrant workers were seen as an obstacle to
the progress of indigenous rivals, and consequently targets for harassment and
persecution.
- Minority situations arising from the period of rapid economic growth whichoccurred in
the industrialized world during the 1950s and 1960s. During the intervening years an
increase of immigrants from poor countries in search of greater opportunities and a better
life, proved problematic to governments in developed countries. West Indians and
Pakistanis to Britain, Mexicans to the United States, Algerians to France, Moluccans to
Holland, Turks and Yugoslavs to Germany and Belgium, Greeks and Maltese to Australia.
The
break-up of the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman Turkish empires after the First World War was
replaced by partisan treatment by majority population in the new states. This resulted in
problems for Hungarians in Romania and Greeks in Turkey, of Serbs and Croats in
Yugoslavia, of Armenians split between Turkey and the USSR, and Kurds between Turkey, Iraq
and Iran.
In Africa the colonial period lasted less than eighty years and
about fifty colonial states included more than a thousand different languages and perhaps
ten times that number of localized ethnic communities. It was inevitable that ethnic
antagonisms should persist within new states that gave rise to minority groups and their
resentment of being excluded from sharing political power.
Some of these large ethnic groups were the Ibo in
Nigeria, the Ganda in Uganda, the Luo in Kenya, and the Chagga in Tanzania, all of which
had enjoyed progress during the colonial era. In European countries ethnic groups were
usually to be found on the peripheries of the Nation States such as the Corsicans
and the Bretons in France, the Basque in Spain, the Celts in Britain and the Lapps in
Scandinavia.
For the most part minorities everywhere have little or no rights. The
complexity of minority situation is made more acute because economic disadvantages in
reality represent both a cause and a consequence of discrimination against these target
groups. Regrettably, the victims that are subjected to mal-treatment at the hands of
majority communities are often times less capable of defending themselves.
Intervention to help or protect minority groups has taken many forms-economic
sanctions, inter governmental negotiations and military interventions from neighboring
territories. Generally, the commitment to protect minorities at governmental level usually
involves UN peacekeeping, and internal policing in open civil conflicts which does not
involve active efforts at political settlement (peacemaking).
Despite enormous progress in safeguarding the rights of
minorities, there are still unresolved issues. Women are not in a minority, but in many
ways they have been treated as such. They are under represented in political spheres and
still virtually invisible in corporate circles.
It seems normal in the West that unemployment among girls and women are
substantially higher than it is among young boys and men. The degree of discrimination
against women in training for skills is indeed very high. There is also prejudice against
women in reaching equal pay for equal work.
Another important situation was the religious minorities in the Soviet
Union. In past years the minority problems of Ireland were in many ways exacerbated by
differences of religion. There is little doubt that Jehovahs Witnesses have suffered
severe persecution in several African countries. Anti-Semitism has led to the persecution
of Jewish minorities over many centuries, but it has seldom been targeted in any way to
the Jewish faith.
Further the emergence of homosexuals who find it necessary to advertise their
difference, publicly and with conviction. But the most serious minority issues in
developed countries evolve around race-cultural difference. The conditions of deprivation
and despair, which confront minorities on a daily basis, are namely:
Inadequate housing and limited government spending on improvements;A
lack of social, cultural and welfare amenities; Inadequate provision of remedial education
for deprived families;A high level of unemployment, particularly among youth.
All levels of government in this country and those world-wide must
pursue efforts to deal with the potential for racial conflict and discrimination on the
basis of race, color or ethnic origin. Consideration should be given to affect change
through legal sanctions and public regulatory agencies, charged with the task of promoting
greater equality of opportunity. Every attempt should be made to educate the population as
a whole about race relations, minimizing the risk of racialized conflicts.
|Given the predicament of minorities, everything should be done to assure their
successful integration in society. Affirmative Action programs must be introduced and
preserved where applicable to create educational opportunities In addition, governments
should introduce job incentives including obligations for employers similar to those for
the disabled. Moreover, emphasis must be placed on providing services to dispossessed and
disadvantaged groups including-legal, financial, technical and other professional
disciplines less occupied by visible ethnic minorities.
Again, where such corrective programs exists, the power
elite should ensure that they are maintained and protected from pugnacious extremists. Too
often programs put in place to rectify passed transgressions are condemned and ridiculed
by bigots and zealots who would have us believe that 300 years of enslavement can be
overturned in 30 years following the enactment of civil rights legislation.
It is important to recognize the power of government and the public
sector with regards to reducing prejudice against minorities in the field of employment.
The children of disadvantaged people need to have role models. There are not enough
minorities in the media, very few among senior positions in education, finance and other
recognized professions.
In political terms, individuals who suffer discrimination simply do not have the power
to change their situation. Power eventually must be exercised through organized groups on
the basis of democratic principles. Perhaps there has never been a more pellucid necessity
for a new era of enlightenment and compassion in which humanity not power is ascendant.
The immense disparity in human living conditions makes a mockery of mans assertions
to societal advancement, much less to morality.
Indeed, never before in the history of civilized
society, governments around the world are obligated to turn aside from injustice, poverty,
and human degradation and away from racial violence, to the human rights of all peoples.
Who will safeguard the liberty and justice of individuals everywhere, if not elected
officials who are entrusted as the peoples representatives?
The inevitable global village will require pluralistic societies
to place greater emphasis on participatory democracy. An essential characteristic of which
will be the inclusion not exclusion of all human kind in nation building or more apropos
continental governments in a unipolar world.
Back to main
|